test
Search publications, data, projects and authors

Free full text available

Article

French

ID: <

10670/1.70fthf

>

Where these data come from
Nominalisations, clandestine referrals and atypical anaphores

Abstract

National hearing. This article examines a number of cases of atypical anaphores, which are particularly frequent after or through the naming of trials. The author draws up an inventory of expressions likely to be nominalised and examines a number of semantic phenomena of which these expressions may be the seat (metonymy, etc.). It then seeks to determine which types of objects are accessible to a reference operation after the propositional formulation of a trial, and by what expressions. The typology of Lyons-Dik was briefly presented and discussed. On the basis of many examples, the author wonders how trials are mentally represented. It shows that the realistic and fixative model of the benchmark is incapable of reporting many anaphore facts which have been regularly documented, and concludes that this difficulty can only be remedied by constructivist design of the reference.

Your Feedback

Please give us your feedback and help us make GoTriple better.
Fill in our satisfaction questionnaire and tell us what you like about GoTriple!