This dissertation responds to a lack within the literature about the impact of private global information on mutual funds portfolio holdings and performance. We conduct three essays that aim to explain different controversial topics about the global funds’ performance and investments choices.In the first paper we examine how the private information on global factors is affecting US global funds’ trading profits. After controlling for different performance benchmark models and for several managerial fund characteristics, we find a positive and significant impact of the private global information on mutual funds’ performance. The fund’s informational advantage on global factors is industry-specific rather than country-specific, consistent with the results of Albuquerque et al. (2009) and Hiraki et al. (2015). We also argue that the use of the degree of sector concentration (DSC) as a proxy for the manager’s informational advantage (as employed in some recent papers) is noisy. The performance of funds is mainly driven by the proxy of private information on industrial factors and not by its degree of sector concentration. DSC affects positively the trading profits of funds in periods of good financial stability. However, this positive impact is only significant for funds with a high informational advantage on global factors.In the second paper, we investigate whether this is the private global information or the familiarity with foreign markets which has driven the performance of global funds during the recent subprime crisis. In fact, it has been shown within the literature that fund managers tend to hold familiar stocks during periods of heightened markets. We find that the private information on global factors of risk is the main driver of funds’ performance for the 2005-2016 period including the subprime crisis period. This result holds when considering different familiarity, market transparency and investor’s protection proxies and when employing different performance benchmark models. On the opposite, the familiarity proxies reverse their effect during the financial crisis period. We show that the “flight to familiarity” within this period is detrimental for funds’ performance and rather can be assessed as a bias. Managers that seek familiarity during periods of financial crisis to be “on the safe side” do not create value for their investors. Our results also suggest that during periods of heightened market uncertainties, fund managers can benefit from processing information on industrial factors, consistent with the findings of Albuquerque et al. (2009) and Hiraki et al. (2015).In our third and last paper, we investigate the determinants of fund’s portfolio rebalancing decisions of foreign holdings that belong to different industries and their relative implication on US global funds’ performance. We find that mutual funds that engage in industrial sector rotation strategies enhance their performance. This result is consistent with the literature view that actively managed funds perform better. Moreover, we find that the fund’s industrial rebalancing activity is positively and significantly affected by its informational advantage on global factors. This study is in line with several papers that highlighted the increasing importance of global industry factors for asset allocation (Hiraki et al., 2015; Schumacher, 2017) and consistent with different arguments stating that industry sector rotation can be optimal for future global investing especially with the increasing integration of capital markets (Weiss, 1998; Cavaglia et al., 2004).