`titrebSupport on violence and victimisation`/titrebThe subject who is tied to the negative and builds on violence and victimisation seems to have an archaic representation of an attacker with whom he identifies on an adhesive mode. This cruel imago works like a magnet for the fragmented parts of ego which are still being ford. The subject seems to take alternatively or simultaneously, the place of the attack and that of the victim, in a paradoxical and anti-separatist link. At this level of primary development spectacular idealistic formations are taking place compared to the superego formations, which are the cause of the fluctuation between these two poles. The author remembers the important distinction between the tyranny suffered, that is to say without complicity, with the variations of forced violence and seductive violence which shock the thought, on one hand, and the consensual or knowing tyranny when the unconscious is involved on the other hand.