the authors support the idea, starting from the recesses of institutional treatment of teenagers in hopital by day and from an individual analytical cure of adults, that the ‘inhibition’ symptoms come together, if they are of major importance, when the subject is subjected, in its relationship with the object, to a seduction-excitation/inhibition dilemma. This would result from a lack of use of the object. Parallelism, the depiction is dying from the object instead of allowing vivifiant reciproc irrigation between Moi and non-Moi. Once again, the suppression of inhibition can result from co-creation by the patient and the analyst, or the institutional carer, of a representation space that allows people to eat new from the world and invest in them in return.