test
Search publications, data, projects and authors

Free full text available

Article

English

ID: <

_yI7nDrXjeMMmduMs-43a

>

Where these data come from
Cyclogeostrophic balance in the Mozambique Channel

Abstract

International audience ; Three methods are proposed for the inclusion of inertia when deriving currents from sea surface height (SSH) in the Mozambique Channel: gradient wind, perturbation expansion, and an iterative method. They are tested in a model and applied to satellite altimetry. For an eddy of 25 cm amplitude and 100 km radius, typical of Mozambique Channel rings at 18°S, the error made with geostrophy is 40% for the anticyclones and 20% for the cyclones. Inertia could reach one third of the pressure gradient. Geostrophy underestimates subsurface currents by up to 50 cm s −1 , resulting in errors of 30–40%. The iterative method results in errors of 50% in Mozambique Channel rings. Geostrophic EKE reaches 1400 cm 2 s −2 , while it attains 1800 cm 2 s −2 when inertia is added. Applied to the Gulf Stream, these methods confirm the hypothesis of Maximenko and Niiler [2006] that centrifugal accelerations should be the main cause for the difference observed between geostrophic and drifter EKE. This methodology should result in a net improvement for operational surface ocean currents.

Your Feedback

Please give us your feedback and help us make GoTriple better.
Fill in our satisfaction questionnaire and tell us what you like about GoTriple!