Hynes, R. O. (2002). Integrins. Cell, 110(6), 673-687. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00971-6

[EN] A family of polymer substrates which consists of a vinyl backbone chain with the side groups ¿COO(CH2)xCH3, with x ¿ 0, 1, 3, 5 was prepared. Substrates with decreasing stiffness, characterised by the elastic modulus at 37 C, and similar chemical groups were obtained. Firstly, we have investigated whether these minute variations in polymer chemistry lead to differences in fibronectin (FN) adsorption: the same FN density was obtained on every substrate (450 ng cm2 ) but the supramolecular organisation of the protein at the material interface, as obtained with AFM, was different for x ¿ 0 and the other surfaces (x ¿ 1, 3, 5). Consequently, this allows one to use a set of substrates (x ¿ 1, 3, 5) to investigate the effect of substrate stiffness on cell behavior as the unique physical parameter, i.e. after ruling out any influence of the length of the side group on protein conformation. Moreover, the importance of investigating the intermediate layer of proteins at the cellmaterial interface is stressed: the effect of x ¿ 0 and x ¿ 1 on cell behavior cannot be ascribed to the different stiffness of the substrate anymore, since the biological activity of the protein on the material surface was also different. Afterwards, initial cellular interaction was investigated using MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts-like cells and focusing on actin cytoskeleton development, focal adhesion formation and the ability of cells to reorganize the adsorbed FN layer on the different substrates. Image analysis was used to quantify the frequency distribution of the focal plaques, which revealed broader distributions on the stiffer substrates, with formation of larger focal plaques revealing that cells exert higher forces on stiffer substrates. The support of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through project MAT2009-14440-C02-01 is kindly acknowledged. CIBER-BBN is an initiative funded by the VI National R&D&I Plan 2008-2011, Iniciativa Ingenio 2010, Consolider Program, CIBER Actions and financed by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III with assistance from the European Regional Development Fund. This work was supported by funds for research in the field of Regenerative Medicine through the collaboration agreement from the Conselleria de Sanidad (Generalitat Valenciana), and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Brizuela Guerra, N.; González-García, C.; Llopis, V.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, JC.; Moratal, D.; Rico Tortosa, PM.; Salmerón Sánchez, M. (2010). Subtle variations in polymer chemistry modulates substrate stiffness and fibronectin activity. Soft Matter. 6(19):4748-4755. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0sm00074d Grinnell, F. (1986). Focal adhesion sites and the removal of substratum-bound fibronectin. The Journal of Cell Biology, 103(6), 2697-2706. doi:10.1083/jcb.103.6.2697 Schwarz, U. S., & Bischofs, I. B. (2005). Physical determinants of cell organization in soft media. Medical Engineering & Physics, 27(9), 763-772. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.007 SIPE, J. D. (2002). Tissue Engineering and Reparative Medicine. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 961(1), 1-9. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb03040.x Werner, C., Pompe, T., & Salchert, K. (2006). Modulating Extracellular Matrix at Interfaces of Polymeric Materials. Advances in Polymer Science, 63-93. doi:10.1007/12_089 García, A. J. (s. f.). Interfaces to Control Cell-Biomaterial Adhesive Interactions. Advances in Polymer Science, 171-190. doi:10.1007/12_071 Anselme, K., Bigerelle, M., Noel, B., Dufresne, E., Judas, D., Iost, A., & Hardouin, P. (2000). Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 49(2), 155-166. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200002)49:23.0.co;2-j Geiger, B., Bershadsky, A., Pankov, R., & Yamada, K. M. (2001). Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2(11), 793-805. doi:10.1038/35099066 Anderson, J. M. (2001). Biological Responses to Materials. Annual Review of Materials Research, 31(1), 81-110. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.81 Wong, J. Y., Leach, J. B., & Brown, X. Q. (2004). Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell–biomaterial interface: Issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response. Surface Science, 570(1-2), 119-133. doi:10.1016/j.susc.2004.06.186 Gray, D. S., Tien, J., & Chen, C. S. (2003). Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young’s modulus. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 66A(3), 605-614. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.10585 Genes, N. G., Rowley, J. A., Mooney, D. J., & Bonassar, L. J. (2004). Effect of substrate mechanics on chondrocyte adhesion to modified alginate surfaces. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 422(2), 161-167. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2003.11.023 Schneider, A., Francius, G., Obeid, R., Schwinté, P., Hemmerlé, J., Frisch, B., … Picart, C. (2006). Polyelectrolyte Multilayers with a Tunable Young’s Modulus: Influence of Film Stiffness on Cell Adhesion. Langmuir, 22(3), 1193-1200. doi:10.1021/la0521802 Ryan, P. L., Foty, R. A., Kohn, J., & Steinberg, M. S. (2001). Tissue spreading on implantable substrates is a competitive outcome of cell-cell vs. cell-substratum adhesivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(8), 4323-4327. doi:10.1073/pnas.071615398 Wong, J. Y., Velasco, A., Rajagopalan, P., & Pham, Q. (2003). Directed Movement of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells on Gradient-Compliant Hydrogels†. Langmuir, 19(5), 1908-1913. doi:10.1021/la026403p Lo, C.-M., Wang, H.-B., Dembo, M., & Wang, Y. (2000). Cell Movement Is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate. Biophysical Journal, 79(1), 144-152. doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76279-5 Bischofs, I. B., & Schwarz, U. S. (2003). Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(16), 9274-9279. doi:10.1073/pnas.1233544100 Schwarz, U. (2007). Soft matters in cell adhesion: rigidity sensing on soft elastic substrates. Soft Matter, 3(3), 263-266. doi:10.1039/b606409d Choquet, D., Felsenfeld, D. P., & Sheetz, M. P. (1997). Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages. Cell, 88(1), 39-48. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81856-5 Vogel, V., & Sheetz, M. (2006). Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7(4), 265-275. doi:10.1038/nrm1890 Discher, D. E. (2005). Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate. Science, 310(5751), 1139-1143. doi:10.1126/science.1116995 Harjanto, D., & Zaman, M. H. (2010). Matrix mechanics and receptor–ligand interactions in cell adhesion. Org. Biomol. Chem., 8(2), 299-304. doi:10.1039/b913064k Pelham, R. J., & Wang, Y. -l. (1997). Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(25), 13661-13665. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13661 Rico, P., Hernández, J. C. R., Moratal, D., Altankov, G., Pradas, M. M., & Salmerón-Sánchez, M. (2009). Substrate-Induced Assembly of Fibronectin into Networks: Influence of Surface Chemistry and Effect on Osteoblast Adhesion. Tissue Engineering Part A, 15(11), 3271-3281. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0141 Otsu, N. (1979). A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9(1), 62-66. doi:10.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076 Altankov, G., Thom, V., Groth, T., Jankova, K., Jonsson, G., & Ulbricht, M. (2000). Modulating the biocompatibility of polymer surfaces with poly(ethylene glycol): Effect of fibronectin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 52(1), 219-230. doi:10.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:13.0.co;2-f García, A. (1999). Integrin–fibronectin interactions at the cell-material interface: initial integrin binding and signaling. Biomaterials, 20(23-24), 2427-2433. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00170-2 Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006). Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification. Cell, 126(4), 677-689. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 Keselowsky, B. G., Collard, D. M., & Garcia, A. J. (2005). Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(17), 5953-5957. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407356102 Barrias, C. C., Martins, M. C. L., Almeida-Porada, G., Barbosa, M. A., & Granja, P. L. (2009). The correlation between the adsorption of adhesive proteins and cell behaviour on hydroxyl-methyl mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials, 30(3), 307-316. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.048 Khatiwala, C. B., Peyton, S. R., & Putnam, A. J. (2006). Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 290(6), C1640-C1650. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00455.2005 Kong, H. J., Polte, T. R., Alsberg, E., & Mooney, D. J. (2005). FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(12), 4300-4305. doi:10.1073/pnas.0405873102 Keselowsky, B. G., Collard, D. M., & Garcı́a, A. J. (2004). Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials, 25(28), 5947-5954. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.062 Keselowsky, B. G., Collard, D. M., & García, A. J. (2003). Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 66A(2), 247-259. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.10537 Gugutkov, D., González-García, C., Rodríguez Hernández, J. C., Altankov, G., & Salmerón-Sánchez, M. (2009). Biological Activity of the Substrate-Induced Fibronectin Network: Insight into the Third Dimension through Electrospun Fibers. Langmuir, 25(18), 10893-10900. doi:10.1021/la9012203 Gugutkov, D., Altankov, G., RodrÃguez HernÃ¡ndez, J. C., MonleÃ³n Pradas, M., & SalmerÃ³n SÃ¡nchez, M. (2010). Fibronectin activity on substrates with controlled ï£¿OH density. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 92A(1), 322-331. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32374 Bae, Y. H., Johnson, P. A., Florek, C. A., Kohn, J., & Moghe, P. V. (2006). Minute changes in composition of polymer substrates produce amplified differences in cell adhesion and motility via optimal ligand conditioning. Acta Biomaterialia, 2(5), 473-482. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2006.04.001 Nicolas, A., Geiger, B., & Safran, S. A. (2004). Cell mechanosensitivity controls the anisotropy of focal adhesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(34), 12520-12525. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403539101 Balaban, N. Q., Schwarz, U. S., Riveline, D., Goichberg, P., Tzur, G., Sabanay, I., … Geiger, B. (2001). Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nature Cell Biology, 3(5), 466-472. doi:10.1038/35074532

Subtle variations in polymer chemistry modulates substrate stiffness and fibronectin activity

Abstract