test
Search publications, data, projects and authors
Virtual Reality as a new approach for risk taking assessment

Articles

<http://hdl.handle.net/10251/136137>
KeywordsTriple Keywords
Risk
Funds
Finance
Funding
Social theory
Sociology
Industries
Industrial production
Industry
Reality
Mental philosophy
Behavioral sciences
Mind
Science, Mental
Psychology
Experience
Individuality
Individuation (Philosophy)
Individuals (Philosophy)
Particulars (Philosophy)
Individuation
Commercial corners
Combinations, Industrial
Combinations in restraint of trade
Industrial trusts
Commercial trusts
Trusts, Industrial
Corners, Commercial
Economic concentration
Industrial groupings
Industrial combinations
Psychagogy
Social psychotechnics
Psychology, Practical
Applied psychology
Psychology, Applied
Personal identity
Personality theory
Personology
Personality traits
Traits, Personality
Personality
Personality psychology
Judgement
Judgment
Thought and thinking
Thoughts
Thinking
Intelligence
Intellect
Human intelligence
Developmental psychology
Development (Psychology)
Volition
Conation
Will
Communication
Mass communication
Communication, Primitive
Evidence
Proof
Ethics, Primitive
Science, Moral
Ethics
Deontology
Morality
Philosophy, Moral
Ethology
Moral philosophy
Morals
Psychology, Social
Mass psychology
Social psychology
Cognition
Virtual reality in education
Human emotions
Feelings
Passions
Emotions
Buildings--Design and construction
Construction
Building design
Western architecture (Western countries)
Architecture, Western (Western countries)
Architecture
Autonomy
Self-government
Independence
Concepts
Concept formation
Annals
History
Facetiae
Wit and humor
Ridiculous, The
Wit and humor, Primitive
Ludicrous, The
Jokes
Bons mots
Humor
Jests

Abstract

[EN] Understanding how people behave when facing hazardous situations, how intrinsic and extrinsic factors influence the risk taking (RT) decision making process and to what extent it is possible to modify their reactions externally, are questions that have long interested academics and society in general. In the spheres, among others, of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH), the military, finance and sociology, this topic has multidisciplinary implications because we all constantly face RT situations. Researchers have hitherto assessed RT profiles by conducting questionnaires prior to and after the presentation of stimuli; however, this can lead to the production of biased, non-realistic, RT profiles. This is due to the reflexive nature of choosing an answer in a questionnaire, which is remote from the reactive, emotional and impulsive decision making processes inherent to real, risky situations. One way to address this question is to exploit VR capabilities to generate immersive environments that recreate realistic seeming but simulated hazardous situations. We propose VR as the next-generation tool to study RT processes, taking advantage of the big four families of metrics which can provide objective assessment methods with high ecological validity: the real-world risks approach (high presence VR environments triggering real-world reactions), embodied interactions (more natural interactions eliciting more natural behaviors), stealth assessment (unnoticed real-time assessments offering efficient behavioral metrics) and physiological real-time measurement (physiological signals avoiding subjective bias). Additionally, VR can provide an invaluable tool, after the assessment phase, to train in skills related to RT due to its transferability to real-world situations. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness funded projects "Advanced Therapeutic Tools for Mental Health" (DPI2016-77396-R), and "Assessment and Training on Decision Making in Risk Environments" (RTC-2017-6523-6) (MINECO/AEI/FEDER, UE). Juan-Ripoll, CD.; Soler-Domínguez, J.; Guixeres Provinciale, J.; Contero, M.; Álvarez Gutiérrez, N.; Alcañiz Raya, ML. (2018). Virtual Reality as a new approach for risk taking assessment. Frontiers in Psychology. 9:1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02532 Alcañiz, M., Rey, B., Tembl, J., & Parkhutik, V. (2009). A Neuroscience Approach to Virtual Reality Experience Using Transcranial Doppler Monitoring. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(2), 97-111. doi:10.1162/pres.18.2.97 Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 230-243. doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4278108 Barsade, S. G., Ramarajan, L., & Westen, D. (2009). Implicit affect in organizations☆. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 135-162. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.008 Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organizational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933-961. doi:10.1177/0149206311398955 Bohil, C. J., Alicea, B., & Biocca, F. A. (2011). Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(12), 752-762. doi:10.1038/nrn3122 Bornovalova, M. A., Cashman-Rolls, A., O’Donnell, J. M., Ettinger, K., Richards, J. B., deWit, H., & Lejuez, C. W. (2009). Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 93(3), 258-262. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2008.10.023 Bottari, C., Dassa, C., Rainville, C., & Dutil, É. (2009). The factorial validity and internal consistency of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile in individuals with a traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19(2), 177-207. doi:10.1080/09602010802188435 BOYER, T. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26(3), 291-345. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.05.002 Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367 Cavalcanti, J., & Soares, M. (2012). Ergonomic analysis of safety signs: a focus of informational and cultural ergonomics. Work, 41, 3427-3432. doi:10.3233/wor-2012-0619-3427 Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 Cooper, M. L., Agocha, V. B., & Sheldon, M. S. (2000). A Motivational Perspective on Risky Behaviors: The Role of Personality and Affect Regulatory Processes. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 1059-1088. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00126 Donohew, R. L., Hoyle, R. H., Clayton, R. R., Skinner, W. F., Colon, S. E., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Sensation seeking and drug use by adolescents and their friends: models for marijuana and alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60(5), 622-631. doi:10.15288/jsa.1999.60.622 Durantin, G., Gagnon, J.-F., Tremblay, S., & Dehais, F. (2014). Using near infrared spectroscopy and heart rate variability to detect mental overload. Behavioural Brain Research, 259, 16-23. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.042 Ernst, L. H., Plichta, M. M., Lutz, E., Zesewitz, A. K., Tupak, S. V., Dresler, T., … Fallgatter, A. J. (2013). Prefrontal activation patterns of automatic and regulated approach–avoidance reactions – A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Cortex, 49(1), 131-142. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.09.013 Ford, M. E., Wentzel, K. R., Wood, D., Stevens, E., & Siesfeld, G. A. (1989). Processes Associated with Integrative Social Competence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4(4), 405-425. doi:10.1177/074355488944002 Forgas, J. P. (1982). Reactions to life dilemmas: Risk taking, success and responsibility attribution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 25-35. doi:10.1080/00049538208254714 Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39-66. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. doi:10.1093/0199271941.001.0001 Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer Influence on Risk Taking, Risk Preference, and Risky Decision Making in Adolescence and Adulthood: An Experimental Study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625-635. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625 George, J. M. (2009). The Illusion of Will in Organizational Behavior Research: Nonconscious Processes and Job Design. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1318-1339. doi:10.1177/0149206309346337 Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A.-K. (2010). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(1), 71-98. doi:10.1002/bdm.684 Greene, J. D. (2009). Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 581-584. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.003 Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004 Greene, J. D. (2001). An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. doi:10.1126/science.1062872 Gullone, E., Moore, S., Moss, S., & Boyd, C. (2000). The Adolescent Risk-Taking Questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(2), 231-250. doi:10.1177/0743558400152003 Hedberg, J., & Alexander, S. (1994). Virtual Reality in Education: Defining Researchable Issues. Educational Media International, 31(4), 214-220. doi:10.1080/0952398940310402 Horvath, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 41-52. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90173-z Jorgensen, P. F. (1996). Affect, persuasion, and communication processes. Handbook of Communication and Emotion, 403-422. doi:10.1016/b978-012057770-5/50017-5 Kilteni, K., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2012). The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4), 373-387. doi:10.1162/pres_a_00124 Kivikangas, J. M., Chanel, G., Cowley, B., Ekman, I., Salminen, M., Järvelä, S., & Ravaja, N. (2011). A review of the use of psychophysiological methods in game research. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 3(3), 181-199. doi:10.1386/jgvw.3.3.181_1 Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2008). A generalization of the representational change theory from insight to non-insight problems: The case of arithmetic word problems. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 315-324. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.08.008 Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., … Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75-84. doi:10.1037/1076-898x.8.2.75 Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by Embodiment. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445-452. doi:10.3102/0013189x13511661 MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1990). Characteristics of Risk Taking Executives. Management Science, 36(4), 422-435. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.4.422 Manchester, D., Priestley, N., & Jackson, H. (2004). The assessment of executive functions: coming out of the office. Brain Injury, 18(11), 1067-1081. doi:10.1080/02699050410001672387 Marín-Morales, J., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Greco, A., Guixeres, J., Llinares, C., Scilingo, E. P., … Valenza, G. (2018). Affective computing in virtual reality: emotion recognition from brain and heartbeat dynamics using wearable sensors. Scientific Reports, 8(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32063-4 Mohamed, S., Ali, T. H., & Tam, W. Y. V. (2009). National culture and safe work behaviour of construction workers in Pakistan. Safety Science, 47(1), 29-35. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.01.003 Motowildo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1 Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton‐O’Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain‐specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157-176. doi:10.1080/1366987032000123856 Parker, S. K., Axtell, C. M., & Turner, N. (2001). Designing a safer workplace: Importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(3), 211-228. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.211 Parsey, C. M., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2013). Applications of Technology in Neuropsychological Assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(8), 1328-1361. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.834971 Parsons, T. D. (2015). Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00660 Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and Control of Response Bias. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, 17-59. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50006-x Paulus, M. P., Rogalsky, C., Simmons, A., Feinstein, J. S., & Stein, M. B. (2003). Increased activation in the right insula during risk-taking decision making is related to harm avoidance and neuroticism. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1439-1448. doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00251-9 Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. doi:10.1037/11494-000 Robson, L. S., Stephenson, C. M., Schulte, P. A., Amick, B. C. I., Irvin, E. L., Eggerth, D. E., … Grubb, P. L. (2011). A systematic review of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety training. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38(3), 193-208. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3259 Rundmo, T. (1996). Associations between risk perception and safety. Safety Science, 24(3), 197-209. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(97)00038-6 Schmitt, N. (1994). Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 393-398. doi:10.1002/job.4030150504 Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Determinants of risk-taking: Behavioral and economic views. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6(1), 49-73. doi:10.1007/bf01065350 Schroeter, R., Oxtoby, J., & Johnson, D. (2014). AR and Gamification Concepts to Reduce Driver Boredom and Risk Taking Behaviours. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI ’14. doi:10.1145/2667317.2667415 Seo, H.-C., Lee, Y.-S., Kim, J.-J., & Jee, N.-Y. (2015). Analyzing safety behaviors of temporary construction workers using structural equation modeling. Safety Science, 77, 160-168. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.010 Sequeira, H., Hot, P., Silvert, L., & Delplanque, S. (2009). Electrical autonomic correlates of emotion. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71(1), 50-56. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.07.009 SITKIN, S. B., & WEINGART, L. R. (1995). DETERMINANTS OF RISKY DECISION-MAKING BEHAVIOR: A TEST OF THE MEDIATING ROLE OF RISK PERCEPTIONS AND PROPENSITY. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1573-1592. doi:10.2307/256844 Skeel, R. L., Neudecker, J., Pilarski, C., & Pytlak, K. (2007). The utility of personality variables and behaviorally-based measures in the prediction of risk-taking behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 203-214. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.025 Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549-3557. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0138 Sneddon, A., Mearns, K., & Flin, R. (2013). Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in offshore drilling crews. Safety Science, 56, 80-88. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.027 Soler, J. L., Contero, M., & Alcañiz, M. (2017). VR Serious Game Design Based on Embodied Cognition Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12-21. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_2 Stanford, M. S., Greve, K. W., Boudreaux, J. K., Mathias, C. W., & L. Brumbelow, J. (1996). Impulsiveness and risk-taking behavior: comparison of high-school and college students using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 1073-1075. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(96)00151-1 STEINBERG, L. (2004). Risk Taking in Adolescence: What Changes, and Why? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021(1), 51-58. doi:10.1196/annals.1308.005 Tsujii, T., & Watanabe, S. (2010). Neural correlates of belief-bias reasoning under time pressure: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1320-1326. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.026 Wang, L., Shute, V., & Moore, G. R. (2015). Lessons Learned and Best Practices of Stealth Assessment. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 7(4), 66-87. doi:10.4018/ijgcms.2015100104 White, T. L., Lejuez, C. W., & de Wit, H. (2008). Test-retest characteristics of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(6), 565-570. doi:10.1037/a0014083 Wills, T. A., Walker, C., Mendoza, D., & Ainette, M. G. (2006). Behavioral and emotional self-control: Relations to substance use in samples of middle and high school students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(3), 265-278. doi:10.1037/0893-164x.20.3.265 Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. doi:10.3758/bf03196322 Yuen, K. S. ., & Lee, T. M. . (2003). Could mood state affect risk-taking decisions? Journal of Affective Disorders, 75(1), 11-18. doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00022-8

...loading
Report a bug

Under construction

We're in Beta!

The GoTriple platform is still in Beta and we keep adding new features everyday. Check the project's website to see what's new and subscribe to our Mailing List.