Article
Undefined
ID: <
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/158442>
Abstract
SUMMARY: Introduction/1- the press and its interference: principles introductifs/2- Application of these principles to judgment commenté/3- Structure of commentary/I. Civil liability of journalistes/4- The press offence: an offence which is in the process of disappearing (?)/5 — The foundations of the civil liability of journalists: liability in cascade... /6-... and Articles 1382 and 1383 of the Civil Code/II. Analysis of the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Bruxelles/7- The criminal records the civil? /8- fault, damage and causality/§ 1. Faute/9- assessment in concreto of faute/1. A sufficiently prudent journalist and diligent/10- A sufficiently prudent journalist and diligent/11- The duty of investigation/12- The obligation of vérification/13- The verification obligation, the facts and the valeur/2 judgements. The criteria for assessing civil misconduct/A. The style used by journaliste/14- The use of style approprié/15- A style corresponding to the type of media/B. The type of information disseminated by journaliste/16- The relationship of information judiciaires/17- Compliance with the principle of presumption of innocence/C. The person referred to in publications/18- Judge De Tandt, public character and magistrate/§ 2. The damage, its compensation, and the link of causalité/19- Non-material damage and a link of causalité/20- Compensation for the damage/Conclusions and future prospects for civil liability of journalistes/21- A judgment in line with the case law on civil liability of journalistes/22- The civil liability of journalists: future outlook