test
Search publications, data, projects and authors

Article

Portuguese

ID: <

oai:doaj.org/article:1f64bc6dba334cd18dc01ae71c85c5f3

>

·

DOI: <

10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9644/2015.v1i1.731

>

Where these data come from
The PRINCIPATION OF MOTIVE OF JUDICIAL RESOLUTIONS IN CONTRIBUTION OF THE ideology OF POLICY TEORY

Abstract

En The prospect of analysing the principle of the statement of reasons for judicial decisions, intentionally in the form of clarifying their regulatory aspects, as opposed to the ideology of the political theory. In order to point out this principle, as a fundamental guarantee of every citizen applying for a right in juicy, or of a citizen who is able to defend himself against a fact, it is characterised as a compulsory primacy recognised by Legal Science there are many centuries, whereas under Brazilian law, political independence had already been legally specific in terms of the reasons for judicial decisions. In the approach that legal science, when applied by law operators, must be correlated with other social systems, such as politics, such as the economy, a juicy value should be attributed to the rule to be applied in the specific case. This valuable judgment includes political theory, as a way to guide the entire legal system, with a precautionary aim, to seek certainty, the correct response to which the judiciary was asked to respond, demonstrating, as an objective of that work, how to interpret and apply legal rules in decisions that disrupt the power of effectiveness. In order not to exhaust the issue in this Article, the industry-based method was used to carry out it, with the interrelationship between the operational methods of bibliographic research techniques, the protocol, the comparator, the methodological methods capable of separating scientific research.

Your Feedback

Please give us your feedback and help us make GoTriple better.
Fill in our satisfaction questionnaire and tell us what you like about GoTriple!