His renovator Aproximación al la History of Spain, Jaume Vicens Vives, addressed without further consideration the critical period between the Queen of Carlos II and the conflict of succession that would end with the establishment of the Borbones. As part of a mandatory possibility, Vicens’ analysis was offered as an equidistant exercise of criticism in relation to the interpretations that dominated the conflict. As a distinctive feature of the rains of the last Austria, the historian Gerdense stressed the presence of an asset foralism that the crown itself seemed to see with eyes other than those of 1640. The fact that the territorial privileges characteristic of that movement were respected did not prevent Vicens from drawing attention to the ‘anquilosophy’ of the whole of the foral system, as a result of its location ‘within an already periclised economic and social structure’.