test
Search publications, data, projects and authors

Article

Portuguese

ID: <

oai:doaj.org/article:881c2f8d6b9245368893860490d7053c

>

Where these data come from
CENTRES OF TECHNICAL ADVICE AND HEALTH JUDICIALISATION: CONSTITUTIONAL OR UNCONSTITUTIONAL? TECHNICAL ADVICE CENTERS AND JUDICIALISATION OF HEALTH: Constitutional or constitutional?

Abstract

RESUMO: O presente trabalho tem como escopo o estudo dos núcleos de assessoria técnica (NATs), órgãos inseridos dentro dos tribunais de justiça, com o fim de auxiliar os magistrados nas decisões envolvendo prestações de medicamentos. Serão observados o crescente processo de judicialização da saúde e o quanto essa tem atingido o Poder Judiciário e o Poder Executivo; a consequente busca por caminhos para a diminuição desse fenômeno através de diálogos institucionais e a criação de órgãos que viabilizem uma interface de consenso entre esses Poderes. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Judicialização. Núcleos de assessoria técnica. Diálogos constitucionais. ABSTRACT: This work aims at studying the Technical Advice Centers in health related lawsuits, specialized departments inserted within the Courts of Justice, with the order to assist the judges in decisions involving benefits of medicines and health care resources. For such will be analyzed the emergence of the phenomena conventionally called “judicialization of health” and the extent of its effects over both Judiciary and other branches of government; the efforts to find paths that lead to reduction the “judicialization” phenomena through dialogs and spaces of consensus between the Executive and the Judiciary. KEYWORDS: Judicialization. Technical advice centers. Constitutional dialogues.

Your Feedback

Please give us your feedback and help us make GoTriple better.
Fill in our satisfaction questionnaire and tell us what you like about GoTriple!