test
Search publications, data, projects and authors

Article

Portuguese

ID: <

oai:doaj.org/article:93fadc42d3c9455b80e7c7aa668fd0bd

>

·

DOI: <

10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9865/2016.v2i1.481

>

Where these data come from
The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional

Abstract

The Federal Constitution of 1988 is silent as to section III of paragraph 4 of article 40, providing for the right to special retirement to public servants, which is why the Supreme Court issued the Binding Precedent 33, ensuring that benefit social security until Law supplement regularly. Social Security have contributive character and should observe criteria that preserve financial and actuarial balance, with its own rules for the General Regime and the Regime Own Social Security. This study is underpinned by the jurisprudential research that originated the precedent and in the references indicated to an end.

Your Feedback

Please give us your feedback and help us make GoTriple better.
Fill in our satisfaction questionnaire and tell us what you like about GoTriple!