Article
Portuguese
ID: <
oai:doaj.org/article:9c1f34eee2734ba497b206535671090e>
·
DOI: <
10.22409/1981-4062/v21i/226>
Abstract
When reflecting on experience through mirrors, that text thinks the relationship between subject and image from the concepts of utopia and Heterotopia. Throughout the paragraphs, it is part of cotidians’ examples to deal with cases where image rights find limited situations, including from some reflections by Michel Focault. There are at least two important hypotheses here: that a utope image of the existence poses dangers which cannot be ignored, and a second one on the possibility of an alternative capable of refinding those risks around aesthetic experience. The aim is to foster the debate linked to the discussion on our ability to report on the images we convey to us.