Propósito – The aim of this work is to investigate, in the philosophical context, the ontological doctrines of naturalism and non-naturalism, which are essential for describing the ways in which the existence is perceived, in order to draw a diametrical bridge to the scope of legal disciplines and market protectionist practices, especially in the light of the general rules of state regulation, taking three distinct economic moments as political and political milestones: the Liberal State, the Social State and the Regulating State, which culminate in this virtually global model of local hetero-regulation of the economy of the current capitalist state. Methodology/approach/design – Whereas all the language used to describe fronyms, which are grossly called reality, is produced from metalinguage – prior to the description of these phenonals, therefore – the present analysis seeks to clarify which metalinguage is (or should be) responsible for the gênese of the regulatory phenonylation and its logical and epistemological boundaries. This is an interdisciplinary search carried out by analysing and collating the works of philosophy authors such as Hume and Rosset, as well as the Economy, such as Smith, Keynes and Hayek. Results – Following the systematic consideration of the concepts under investigation, we argue that there are no necessary ontological instances to determine the discovery of a particular natural order for the market, which is why any thecné that is genuinely intended to be regulated must remain in the field of contingency, which is also an area of policy. In my view, it is imperative that the legal matters currently seen as closer to the technological sphere go back to their humanistic origins in order to (re) discover their social character and thus their feelings who owe meaning also to subjectivity.