En The operative part, which is the subject of this analysis, the Supreme Court of Justice of Rio Negro, denounces the judgment of the Chamber of Appeal in civil, commercial, family and mining matters on the ground that it was delivered without listening to the adolescent and ordered that it take place before a new decision in accordance with the law is issued. Against this background, this work seeks to illustrate closely the seriousness of denying constitutional rights, such as the right of children, children and young people to be heard, and for their opinion to be taken into account in matters that affect them directly and even more so on the basis of the child’s disability, which is completely incompatible with the current design of disability based on human rights and inclusive equality.