The history of art is marked by a series of alterations and transformations that shape their fisonomy. It could be said that the same it is only the total sum of these changes. This development was accompanied by the finding the difference as a constituent element. Thus, since the proposal theory of Arthur danto, the history of art would have come to an end once experimentation gave its specific definition from philosophy; while whereas for Gilles Deleuze’s approach, the history of art is nothing more than the a set of conditions from which it is necessary to flee for the creation of the new one, that is to say, the difference. The purpose of this test is to articulate two dissimilar readings under a common problem: the concept of difference as a constituent of art.